Reasoning About Compositions of Concerns
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we propose a framework for defining and reasoning about compositions of concerns, based on multivalued logics. Rather than providing a small set of built-in composition operations, our framework provides a mechanism for constructing arbitrary types of composition. Our multi-valued logic model checker, chek allows us to reason about the properties of compositions of concerns.
منابع مشابه
Implementing Stochastically-Timed COWS for the Prism Probabilistic Model Checker
This thesispresents the implementationof theCOWS2Prism system, a compiler for stochastic COWS (Calculus for Orchestration of Web Services) into Prism. The process calculus COWS is intended to aid in the precise description of Web Services compositions. This places the present informal development approach associated with Web Services into a formal reasoning framework. The COWS calculus concerns...
متن کاملEarly and Middle Adolescents’ Reasoning About Moral and Personal Concerns in Opposite-sex Interactions
This study examined how adolescents coordinate personal and moral concerns in reasoning about opposite-sex interactions. Sixty-four early and middle adolescents (Ms = 12.74, 16.05 years) were individually interviewed about two hypothetical situations involving opposite-sex interactions (commenting on appearance, initiating a date), presented in four conditions that varied the salience of person...
متن کاملWhat definition of information would be emancipatory one?
Background and Aim: Human-information interaction, either in every day life or in research approaches, depends on pre-assumptions about “what information is”. Sometimes this pre-assumptions become axiomtic in a way that we must return to primary concerns about them to explore new social phenomenas. Information as an object is one of pre-assumptions. In this paper, the mentioned pre-assumptions ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Bayesian Reasoning Training on the Results of Clinical Reasoning Tests of Interns
Introduction: Clinical reasoning includes a range of thinking about clinical medicine at all stages of patient evaluation. Bayesian theory can be used to refute or confirm differential diagnoses in the clinical reasoning process. In this way, by learning the basic mathematical language of probability in medicine, we can change our beliefs according to new evidence. The aim of this study is to i...
متن کاملModels of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: a critical review
Introduction: Diagnosis lies at the heart of general practice.Every day general practitioners (GPs) visit patients with awide variety of complaints and concerns, with often minor butsometimes serious symptoms. General practice has many featureswhich differentiate it from specialty care setting, but during thelast four decades little attention was paid to clinical reasoningin general practice. T...
متن کامل